![]() "insufficient" evidence for a worldwide flood and certain ancient battles recorded in Joshua, Jesus being a Pharisee, the Four gospels being written after 70 A.D. ![]() ![]() There are a handful of places in which Enns takes for granted certain controversial scholarly conjectures without much elaboration (e.g. (To be fair, though, it's not as though Enns is being illogical the book is actually very logical). Peter Enns deserves 5 stars for every one of these factors except logical argumentation. A lot of factors affect the amount of stars I give each book: readability, the depth of research involved (footnotes/endnotes/bibliography/appendices), logical argumentation (to support the entire thesis), the goal or aim (telos) of the book (plot development), good humor/sarcasm, author's temper, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |